New member here, I've read a lot but obviously not everything on the forum so I apologize if it's been covered before.
2 Car family, Tesla and Subaru Outback. Tesla for most trips (much cheaper to drive and AP makes road trips easy) and Outback for bad weather, towing, hauling.
Preferred option 1: Replace Outback with Solterra - this makes the most sense, both are targeted for the same use case. Except.... there's NO TOWING! I find this to be the most stupid decision on their part.
Alternative option 2: Replace Tesla with Solterra - Not possible due to ok range but super bad charging rates. ABRP shows a road trip down the east coast in the Solterra has MORE charges and MORE charging time and cost MORE than even prior generation EV's (Kona). Charging time is 100% more than Tesla and Ioniq5/EV6, and 50% more than ID4, slightly longer than Kona EV. Running cost/mi (.14c/kwh daily + abrp for road tripping... is at the high end of its peers and much more expensive vs the Tesla)
Total cost is not a significant advantage vs its peers. There are dealerships out there that will not charge over MSRP.
Overall, I'm just really disappointed that Subaru did not rate this car for towing. This car does not compete with its peers and certainly not with smaller cars as a road tripper. It's strengths are 'go anywhere' car.... which is why I have an Outback. If it had 2700lb towing like the Outback, I would have turned my reservation into an order the first day I could...
As is, I think I'll pass on the Solterra. What am I missing? Is Subaru really targeting a 'go anywhere' crowd as long as it's not too far away (or have lots of time) and don't need to tow anything?